Electronic Medical Record Officers' Perception of Ease of Filling, Security and Legal Evidence

Authors

  • Jamal Nasir Husni Universitas Respati Jakarta
  • Sumijatun Sumijatun Universitas Respati Jakarta
  • Tina Rosa Universitas Respati Jakarta

Keywords:

medical, officer, perception, record

Abstract

Hospitals using electronic medical records (EMR) face a number of challenges, such as poor system functionality, a lack of computer skills among medical personnel, and concerns about data security and privacy. Hospital adoption of these systems is also often hampered by high implementation costs. The purpose of this study was to determine how staff at Bhayangkara Level III Hospital in Banda Aceh, who work with electronic medical records, perceive security, ease of entry, and legal evidence. A cross-sectional study design was used in conjunction with quantitative research. Using a total sampling method, 36 EMR staff were sampled. An instrument developed based on existing literature was used to collect data. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed on the data. The study findings partially indicate a very strong relationship between perceptions of EMR and ease of data entry (P = 0.0001) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.992; a very strong relationship between perceptions of EMR and data security (P = 0.0001) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.922; and a very strong relationship between RME perceptions and legal evidence (P = 0.0001) with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.369. Based on the research findings, RME staff perceptions are strongly correlated with data security, ease of data entry, and legal evidence.

References

Amalia, N., Rustam, M. Z. A., Rosarini, A., Wijayanti, D. R., & Riestiyowati, M. A. (2021). The implementation of electronic medical record (EMR) in the development health care system in Indonesia. 8-12.

Amin, M., Setyonugroho, W., & Hidayah, N. (2021). Implementation of electronic medical records: a qualitative study. 8(1), 430-442.

Arar, K., Sawalhi, R., DeCuir, A., & Amatullah, T. (2023). Islamic-based educational leadership, Administration and Management: Challenging expectations through global critical insights. Taylor & Francis.

Bharata, Y., Zamroni, M., & Pramono, B. (2024). Medical Dispute Resolution Based on RME Data Through Restorative Justice. 9(1), 42-54.

Browning, L., Raza-Khan, U., Leggat, S., & Boyd, J. H. (2025). The Impact of Electronic Medical Record Implementation on the Process and Outcomes of Nursing Handover: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. 2025(1), 5585723.

Cahill, M., Cleary, B. J., & Cullinan, S. (2025). The influence of electronic health record design on usability and medication safety: systematic review. 25(1), 31.

Damanik, F. S., Widayanti, A. W., & Wiedyaningsih, C. (2025). Exploring Technology Acceptance Models: A Systematic Review of Health Application Adoption in Asian Countries. 15(2), 110-120.

Dewi, N. F., Grataridarga, N., Setiawati, R., & Syahidah, Q. N. (2020). Identification of Completeness of Metadata Filling in Outpatient Medical Records at Bunda Aliyah Depok Hospital. 2(2), 3.

Dwijosusilo, K., & Sarni, S. (2018). The Role of Electronic Medical Records in the Hospital Management Information System at Haji General Hospital Surabaya.

Honavar, S. G. (2020). Electronic medical records–The good, the bad and the ugly. In (Vol. 68, pp. 417-418): Medknow.

Ibrahim, A. A., Zamzuri, M. A. I. A., Ismail, R., Ariffin, A. H., Ismail, A., Hasani, M. H. M., & Manaf, M. R. A. (2022). The role of electronic medical records in improving health care quality: A quasi-experimental study. 101(30), e29627.

Janett, R. S., & Yeracaris, P. P. (2020). Electronic Medical Records in the American Health System: challenges and lessons learned. 25, 1293-1304.

Jimma, B. L., & Enyew, D. B. (2022). Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records from the perspective of physicians and nurses: A scoping review. 31, 100991.

Juliansyah, R., Aqid, B. M., Salsabila, A. P., & Nurfiyanti, K. (2024). Implementation of EMR system in Indonesian health facilities: benefits and constraints.

Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). 60, 101212.

Latuconsina, N. D., Dewi, T. C., & Susantyo, A. (2019). Review of Retention Implementation in Accordance with Indonesian Minister of Health Regulation No. 269 of 2008 and Snars Accreditation at Kanjuruhan Regional Hospital, Malang Regency. 1(1), 11-16.

Lee, A. T., Ramasamy, R. K., & Subbarao, A. (2025). Understanding Psychosocial Barriers to Healthcare Technology Adoption: A Review of TAM Technology Acceptance Model and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and UTAUT Frameworks. Healthcare,

Markus, M. G., Kambey, J., & Tala, O. (2023). Analysis of BPJS Fund Management Based on Minister of Health Regulation Number 6 of 2022 at the Ondong Community Health Center, Sitaro Regency. 8(3).

Mulukuntla, S. (2020). Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Assessing the Impact on Patient Care and Safety. 6(3), 27-33.

Nur, F., & Fitrianto, B. (2024). The Role Of Electronic Medical Records In Medical Dispute Resolution: Legal Review. 2(3), 520-528.

Paramesthi, P., Jati, S. P., & Suryoputro, A. (2024). The use of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. 40, e11727.

Pool, J., Akhlaghpour, S., Fatehi, F., & Burton-Jones, A. (2024). A systematic analysis of failures in protecting personal health data: A scoping review. 74, 102719.

Pratiwi, A. B., Padmawati, R. S., & Willems, D. L. (2022). Behind open doors: Patient privacy and the impact of design in primary health care, a qualitative study in Indonesia. 9, 915237.

Putri, A. A., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Legal analysis of aspects of medical disputes: Perspectives of resolution and prevention. 1(2), 2075-2085.

Rubiyanti, N. S. (2023). Implementation of Electronic Medical Records in Hospitals in Indonesia: A Legal Study. 1(1), 179-187.

Setyadi, D., & Nadjib, M. (2023). The Effect Of Electronic Medical Records On Service Quality And Patient Satisfaction: A Literature Review. 2(12).

Sher, M.-L., Talley, P. C., Yang, C.-W., & Kuo, K.-M. (2017). Compliance with electronic medical records privacy policy: An empirical investigation of hospital information technology staff. 54, 0046958017711759.

Sitepu, A. I. L. (2024). The Relationship Between The Completeness Of Electronic Medical Records And The Timeliness Of Bpjs Health Claim Submission And Pending Claims At Randegansari Husada Hospital, Gresik, Stikes Yayasan RS Dr. Soetomo Surabaya].

Sutha, D. W., Christine, C., Masyfufah, L., Faida, E. W., Wahyuni, T., Novianti, S., & Syalfina, A. D. (2025). The Impact of Use of Electronic Medical Records on The Quality Of Health Services and Patient Safety. 3(1), 1-11.

WHO. (2020). Digital health platform handbook: building a digital information infrastructure (infostructure) for health. World Health Organization.

Wijayanti, D., Ujianto, E. I. H., & Rianto, R. (2024). Uncovering Security Vulnerabilities in Electronic Medical Record Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Threats and Recommendations for Enhancement. 10(1), 73-98.

Wulandari, I., Budiono, A., & Soekiswati, S. (2025). Electronic Medical Records (ELMR) and the Public Perspective on Privacy Rights. 5(4), 2680-2686.

Yi, M. (2018). Major Issues in Adoption of Electronic Health Records. 16(4).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-05

How to Cite

Husni, J. N., Sumijatun, S., & Rosa, T. (2025). Electronic Medical Record Officers’ Perception of Ease of Filling, Security and Legal Evidence . Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research, 7(6), 141–152. Retrieved from https://jurnal2.globalhealthsciencegroup.com/index.php/IJGHR/article/view/244

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.