Effectiveness of the Biothesiometer and the Comprehensive Diabetic Neuropathy Screening Algorithm (CDNSA) in Detecting Diabetic Neuropathy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v8i5.2517Keywords:
biothesiometry, diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathies, early diagnosisAbstract
Diabetic neuropathy is a chronic complication of diabetes mellitus that often remains undetected in its early stages and may progress to foot ulcers and amputation. Early detection at the primary healthcare level is essential to prevent further complications. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Diabetic Neuropathy Screening Algorithm (CDNSA) compared with a biothesiometer as the reference standard in detecting diabetic neuropathy among patients with diabetes mellitus at Soromandi Primary Healthcare Center, Indonesia. This quantitative diagnostic test accuracy study used a cross-sectional approach. A total of 64 patients with diabetes mellitus who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited using consecutive sampling. Data were collected in 2025 through direct clinical assessments using both the CDNSA and a biothesiometer. The CDNSA assessed large-fiber function using a 10-g monofilament and a 128-Hz tuning fork and small-fiber function using pinprick and cold sensation tests, whereas the biothesiometer measured the Vibration Perception Threshold (VPT). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), overall accuracy, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. CDNSA demonstrated a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 80%, and overall diagnostic accuracy of 100%. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 97.1%, indicating excellent discriminatory ability in distinguishing patients with and without diabetic neuropathy. The CDNSA demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance and may serve as a practical and comprehensive screening method for the early detection of diabetic neuropathy in primary healthcare settings.
References
Bowling, F. L., et al. (2012). (Referensi tentang cut-off VPT ≥25 Volt untuk neuropati diabetik).
Busui, R., et al. (2022). (Referensi tentang korelasi ambang getar dengan risiko ulkus kaki diabetik).
Callaghan, B. C., et al. (2020). (Referensi instrumen skrining neuropati berbasis skor klinis setara dengan alat teknologi).
Dewi. (2023). (Referensi komplikasi DM menurunkan kualitas hidup).
Febriyanti. (2023). (Referensi neuropati diabetik sering asimptomatik tahap awal).
Hajian, et al. (2020). (Interpretasi ROC/AUC: AUC >0,90 kategori excellent).
Halmar, et al. (2019). (Patofisiologi neuropati: gangguan suplai nutrisi saraf dan akumulasi sorbitol).
Hudiyawati, et al. (2023). (Neuropati diabetik sebagai komplikasi umum DM tipe 2: gangguan sensorik, motorik, otonom). Hnit, et al. (2022). (Biothesiometer sebagai metode unggul dan standar emas deteksi neuropati dan risiko ulkus).
International Diabetes Federation. (2021). (Data proyeksi peningkatan DM global 2030–2045). Jones, et al. (2023). (Deteksi dini neuropati dan perawatan kaki mencegah ulkus diabetik).
Kemenkes. (2020). (Data DM Indonesia: proyeksi 30 juta tahun 2030 dan peringkat penyebab kematian).
Komalasari. (2020). (Neuropati diabetik sebagai komplikasi sering pada DM). Malik, et al. (2020). (Prevalensi neuropati di Asia Tenggara: Malaysia, Filipina, Indonesia).
Mugiyanto, E., & Fajriyah, N. N. (2022). (Biothesiometer untuk menilai VPT dan risiko ulkus).
Purwanti, et al. (2024). (Instrumen skrining neuropati: TCNS, MNSI, TNS, NDS, monofilament, Ipswich, USG, NCS, EMG).
Purwanti, et al. (2024a). (Pengembangan instrumen deteksi dini neuropati diabetik).
Rachman. (2021). (Definisi metode kuantitatif survei).
Rachmantoko, et al. (2021). (Gejala neuropati diabetik dan risiko ulkus, infeksi, amputasi).
Selvarajah, D., et al. (2023). (Kebutuhan sensitivitas dan spesifisitas tinggi dalam skrining neuropati perifer).
Tesfaye, S., et al. (2021). (False negative tetap perlu evaluasi klinis lanjutan pada pasien risiko tinggi).
Yeni, et al. (2025). (Pengembangan CDNSA untuk deteksi dini neuropati diabetik).
Ziegler, et al. (2022). (Tenaga kesehatan cenderung mendiagnosis neuropati setelah tanda klinis muncul).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








