From Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry ot Positron Emission Tomography: Diverse Imaging Approaches to Body Composition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v7i6.1172Keywords:
body composition, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, fat distribution, imaging techniquesAbstract
Accurate body composition assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing health issues such as obesity, osteoporosis, and metabolic disorders. Diverse imaging approaches, including DXA, US, CT, MRI, and PET, each offer unique insights into body composition. By exploring these diverse imaging methods, clinicians and researchers can achieve a comprehensive understanding of body composition, leading to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and more personalized treatment strategies. Comprehensive understanding of various imaging techniques such as Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), Ultrasonography (US), Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in body composition analysis. Body composition analysis utilizes several imaging techniques to provide a comprehensive assessment. DXA is used to measure bone mineral density and differentiate between fat and lean mass by analyzing how X-rays are absorbed at two different energy levels. US uses high-frequency sound waves to create real-time images of soft tissues, enabling the measurement of muscle thickness and fat layers. CT scans offer detailed cross-sectional images of fat and muscle distribution, while MRI produces high-resolution images of soft tissues without radiation. PET scans use radiotracers to monitor metabolic activity and detect functional changes in tissues.The exploration of diverse imaging approaches reveals the strengths and limitations of each method in body composition analysis. DXA is gaining popularity among clinicians for body composition analysis because it provides accurate measurements of lean and fat mass, similar to CT and MRI, but at a lower cost and with less invasiveness. Its widespread availability and precision in assessing both bone mineral density and soft tissue composition across the entire body or specific regions make DXA a valuable tool for managing osteoporosis and studying changes in body composition in various health conditions.
References
Andreolli, A., Garaci, F., Cafarelli, F. P., & Guglielmi, G. (2016). Body composition in clinical practice. European Journal of Radiology, 85(8), 1461–1468.
Andreolli, A., Scalzo, G., Masala, S., Tarantino, U., & Guglielmi, G. (2009). Body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). La radiology medica, 114(2), 286–300.
Albanese, C. V., Diesel, E., & Genant, H. K. (2003). Clinical Applications of Body Composition Measurements Using DXA. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 6(2), 75–85.
Blue, M. N. M., Tinsley, G. M., Ryan, E. D., & Smith-Ryan, A. E. (2015). Validity of Body-Composition Methods across Racial and Ethnic Populations. Advances in Nutrition, 12(5).
Chaves, L. G. C. de M., Gonçalves, T. J. M., Bitencourt, A. G. V., Rstom, R. A., Pereira, T. R., & Velludo, S. F. (2022). Assessment of body composition by whole-body densitometry: what radiologists should know. Radiologia Brasileira, 55(5), 305–311.
Chianca, V., Albano, D., Messina, C., Gitto, S., Ruffo, G., Guarino, S., Del Grande, F., & Sconfienza, L. M. (2021). Sarcopenia: imaging assessment and clinical applications. Abdominal Radiology, 47(9), 3205–3216.
Knapp, K. M., Welsman, J. R., Hopkins, S. J., Shallcross, A., Fogelman, I., & Blake, G. M. (2015). Obesity Increases Precision Errors in Total Body Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements. Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 18(2), 209–216.
Lim, J. S. (2010). Pediatric dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: interpretation and clinical and research applications. Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 53(3), 286.
Messina, C., Albano, D., Gitto, S., Tofanelli, L., Bazzocchi, A., Ulivieri, F. M., Guglielmi, G., & Sconfienza, L. M. (2020). Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from basics to new tools. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 10(8), 1687–1698.
Murata, H., Yagi, T., Midorikawa, T., Torii, S., Takai, E., & Taguchi, M. (2022). Comparison between DXA and MRI for the Visceral Fat Assessment in Athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(07), 625–631.
Paris, M. T. (2019). Body Composition Analysis of Computed Tomography Scans in Clinical Populations: The Role of Deep Learning. Lifestyle Genomics, 13(1), 28–31.
Price, K. L., & Earthman, C. P. (2018). Update on body composition tools in clinical settings: computed tomography, ultrasound, and bioimpedance applications for assessment and monitoring. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73(2), 187–193.
Salmón-Gómez, L., Moncada, R., Frühbeck, G., & Gómez-Ambrosi, J. (2023). Relevance of body composition in phenotyping the obesity. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 24(5), 809–823.
van der Sluis, I. M., de Ridder, M. A. J., Boot, A. M., Krenning, E. P., & de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, S. M. P. F. (2002). Reference data for bone density and body composition measured with dual energy x ray absorptiometry in white children and young adults. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 87(4), 341–347.
Wang, H., Chen, Y. E., & Eitzman, D. T. (2014). Imaging Body Fat. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 34(10), 2217–2223.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







