The Effect of Closed Suction System Use on the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v8i3.1137Keywords:
closed suction system, endotracheal suctioning, mechanical ventilation, open suction system, ventilator associated pneumoniaAbstract
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common and serious infections in patients who use mechanical ventilation. It has an incidence of 5–50% and contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. One of the efforts to prevent Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the endotracheal suctioning procedure. Currently, there are closed suction systems and open suction systems. However, scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of closed suction systems in reducing the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains variable. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of closed versus open suction systems in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated adult patients, This study is a systematic review of 13 articles published between 2020 until 2025, which were selected through the PRISMA-2020 process using databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and Semantic Scholar. The inclusion studies involved adult patients who were mechanically ventilated for more than 48 hours and reported the incidence of ventilator–associated pneumonia (VAP) as the primary outcome. The review showed that most studies reported no significant difference between closed and open suction systems in reducing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (p < 0.05). However, several studies have shown additional clinical benefits of closed suction systems, including improved oxygenation, reduced hypoxia, delayed onset of VAP, and reduced end expiratory pressure (PEEP). One study reported a significant reduction in VAP when closed suction was combined with chlorhexidine flushing. The close suction system has not been conclusively proven to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), however, it provides valuable clinical and safety benefits.
References
Ardehali et al. (2020). The Effects of Open and Closed Suction Methods on Occurrence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia; a Comparative Study. Archives of AcademicEmergencyMedicine. 2020;8(1):e8
Eid et al (2023) . Suction Circuit Flushing with Chlorhexidine Decreases Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Quasi-experimental Study. Sec. Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesiology. Volume 10 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295277
Giang, at All . Predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia with machine learning . Medicine 100(23):p e26246, June 11, 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026246
Irfan, M. Nugraha (2023). The Relationship Between Suction Frequency and the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP). (2023). Journal of Anesthesiology Tiara Bunda , 2 (2), 27-39. https://jurnal.poltektiarabunda.ac.id/index.php/jatb/article/view/221
Jung, et al (2021). Closed Endotracheal Suctioning Impact on Ventilator-Related Parameters in Obstructive and Restrictive Respiratory Systems: A Bench Study. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115266
Mula et al (2023). Efficacy of Closed and Open Endotracheal Suction on Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients Admitted to Critical Care Unit at Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University | Published by Wolters Kluwer - MedknowDOI: 10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_618_22
Pakizeh et al (2023). Comparison of the Effect of Open and Closed Suction Methods on the Incidence of Hypoxia and VAP in ICU Patients. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3214173/v1
Pawlik et al (2022). Risk Factors and Protective Factors against Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia — A Single-Center Mixed Prospective and Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Press. Med. 2022, 12, 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040597
Qureshi, et al. (2025). Frequency of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia with Closed Tracheal Suction versus Open Tracheal Suction. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2025; 75(SUPPL-2): S335
Samanta, Sukhen . At All. Incorporating Lung Ultrasound in Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as an Added Tool for Diagnosing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center . Indian journal Critical Med. 2021 Mar;25(3):284–291. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23759
Ramírez et al (2023). Closed Endotracheal Suction Systems for COVID-19: Rapid Review
Raichurkar et al(2024). Complete Closed-Loop Ventilatory Circuit Delays the Onset of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Mechanically Ventilated Neurological Patients in the ICU. JNeuroanaesthesiolCritCare2024;11:93–99. DOI https://doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0044-1787541. ISSN2348-0548.
Sanaie, Sarvin (2022). Comparison Of Closed Vs Open Suction In Prevention Of Ventilators – Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis, Indian J Crit Care med. 26(7): 839-845 doi: 10.5005/jp-journal-10071-24252
Schverdfinger et al. (2021). Tracheal Aspirate with Closed Suction Device: A Modified Technique Developed during the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acci.2020.12.004
Sinha et al. (2022). Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: Is the Dilemma Still “Open” or “Closed”?. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (2022): 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24249
Vijaysabari et al (2024). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Suctioning with Closed Tracheal Suction and Open Tracheal Suction Systems in Adult Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. DOI: 10.47009/jamp.2024.6.2.39 Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared Int J Acad Med Pharm 2024; 6(2); 188-192
Wulandar et al. (2024). Effectiveness of Oral Hygiene, Close Suction, and Head Up 30–45° as a VAP Prevention Bundle in the ICU of Prof. Dr. IGNG Ngoerah General Hospital, Bali. Altruistic Nursing Scientific Journal (JIKA) Vol. 7 No. 1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
